Archive for June, 2009

RTM错误诠释A(H1N1)混淆民众

Posted in 科学 (Science) with tags , , on June 25, 2009 by sanjiun

A(H1N1)病毒肆虐,卫生部的龟速反应令人失望。不仅如此,我们还可以经常听到卫生部长和有关单位在接受媒体访问时说:

1)现在情况受到控制。。。
2)我们没有接到公众投诉。。。
3)我们暂时不会这么做。。。
4)卫生部会时时刻刻观察情况演变。。。
5)我们不想引起公众恐慌。。。
6)公众要提高警惕。。。
7)那都是反对党在炒作,把问题政治化。。。(针对武吉公满廖部长的回复)

事实上,最让人民恐慌的,不是卫生部“小题大做”,而是卫生部“什么都不做”。我已经不止一次拿我国的防疫措施,和邻国来比较。邻国的防疫措施不仅充足, 而且在资讯传达和正确教育人民的方面做得更好。

连连几宗本土感染,导致数间学校被迫关闭。卫生部不但没有积极的传达流感资讯,反而责怪一些人没有卫生意识。再看看邻国新加坡。经过SARS疫情后,人民的防疫意识普遍提高。每一个人都会自动自发的戴口罩,每日测量体温。新国人民甚至每家每户都会备有一支体温测量器,随时自我测量体温。

更要命的是A(H1N1)病毒开始在墨西哥蔓延至今,已经好多个月了。虽然已开始科学家认为A(H1N1) = 猪流感,但是后来经过研究人员验证后,才发现和猪流感无关。就在疫情暴发不久,各国(包括大马)也已经开始替流感正名,还猪猪一个清白。

身为政府口舌的国营电台,RTM更应该(早就)开始挑起这个重大的责任,确保政府部门的消息可以正确无误的传达给广大民众。可惜,数国营电台仍一再使用“猪流感”或者“SELESEMA KHINZIR”一词来误导民众(自己亲耳听过,也吓了一跳)。聪明的新闻部长,莱斯雅丁,还把国营电视台的错误,解释为:

国营电视马来节目把甲型流感的名字改回“猪流感”,是为了减少乡村马来民众的混淆。

A(H1N1)流感肆虐至今,廖部长才来说要纠正国营电视台的错误,会不会迟得太夸张了一点?这样做究竟是在减少马来民众的混淆,还是在混淆马来民众???

在这个非常时期,资讯传达非常重要。就偏偏国营电台RTM非但不传递“正确”资讯,更负责散播“错误资讯”来误导民众。

这几天,在面子书上,听见(看见)一位被主流媒体混淆的马来朋友抱怨说:

怀疑本地感染A(H1N1)的(非巫裔)病人都是因为食用过猪肉而引起的?

还说当初禽流感和手足口症来袭时,有关当局大量销毁鸡只和牛只。这次面对猪流感,竟然坐视不理,不把猪只销毁。更抨击有关当局为了利益,保护养猪业?!?

网友们和他“坳”了半天,告诉他A(H1N1)不会因为吃猪肉而感染。更说明了不管吃什么肉类,只要处理不当(煮不熟),就会感染病菌。就好像禽流感,还有肝炎病毒。但是,他竟然一昧地把矛头指向猪只。还说,虽然吃猪肉未必会感染病毒,可是猪只还是罪魁祸首,应该销毁。言谈之间,已经开始越来越“种族化”!!!

最后,我被迫要把CDC发布的文章,贴上去给他看。然后解释:A(H1N1)虽然和猪流感病毒相似,可是科研人员已经证实两者之间的相似度不高。猪流感不会造成大规模的人类感染。可是因为A(H1N1)病毒含有禽流感,人类流感的病毒基因,所以,才让病毒适应人类体内的环境。倘若猪只有罪,那么人类贡献了流感病毒基因,导致猪流感变成人类流感,那么人类不是更加罪该万死吗?如果按照他的逻辑来控制疫情,是不是连人类也要以并销毁?!?

听了我的解释,他才不再抱怨。更说不能怪他没有专业医药知识(这不是专门知识,是在防疫关头必须要有的common sense!!!)

大马国民会有这种错误的思想,就是因为大马有关单位(尤其是新闻部),允许国营电视台不切实报道真相的缘故,把A(H1N1)等同于“猪流感”。

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing。人民不知道真相所引起的恐慌,猪只不是罪魁祸首。新闻部长莱斯雅丁之前的举动,才是让民众陷入恐慌的罪魁祸首!


SWINE FLU SONG

Miss piggy, Arnold Ziffle neither has a little sniffle
Porky Pig and Pooh’s Piglet no fever yet
Putnam, Gordy, Toot and Puddle
Not contagious safe to snuggle
Ask Petunia, Babe, Noelle
All of them feel well
Wilber, Hamm, Hogzilla too none of them have caused the flu
Wash your hands, wear a mask “how’d this happen?” people ask
How it started I don’t know stay away from Mexico
Now it’s in the USA no ones safe this day and age

*Pigs didn’t start the swine flu *
Blame the laboratory for this awful story
Pigs didn’t start the swine flu
No we’ve been betrayed
*The strain appears man-made*

Viral codes of human flu, bird influenza’s in there too
The only thing I seem to find people blame the swine

Read the papers post your blog, blame it on the lowly hog
Down some aspirin take a swig your infected by the pig
Everyone thinks I’m contagious read it on my twitter pages
You can hug me you won’t die come and hang out in my sty
Eat your dinner throw it up no one blames it on the pup
Run a temp and get the chills everyone run for the hills

*
Name diseases after pigs everyone throws dirty digs
I’m a virus people think I’m not sick I’m clean and pink
I’m your friend your little buddy I don’t know why you feel cruddy
Don’t blame me I’m not the cause
Government should change laws
People sick across the nation looking for a vaccination
Center for disease control someone there has got to know
This disease it needs a name which animals should we defame
Nobody will likely mind if we name it for an ugly swine!

*chorus* X2

the pigs are innocent I tell you
we didn’t do anything wrong
we didn’t start this disease
but we’re taking all the blame
take pity on pigs

中央拨款,是人民省吃俭用纳的税!!!

Posted in 政经文教 (Politic) with tags , on June 23, 2009 by sanjiun

50多年的一党独大。。。

人民省吃俭用纳了税,中央政府的钱不再属于人民?!?

农业及农基工业部長拿督诺奧馬说:

“因為中央撥款是國陣的錢,國陣必須履行大選時所許下的承諾,所以只有國陣議員才能加入!”

农长的话,激起了冯宝君的怒火。

“這不是國陣的錢!這是人民的錢!不要用人民的錢來政治化課題!
如果我的選區(華都牙也)的選民拒絕了國陣候選人,就應該將撥款交由我們處理惠及人民。”

眼见自己的一番话不对头,诺奥马补充:

“所謂國陣的錢,就是政府的錢!而且民聯在執政霹靂時,也一樣撤換國陣支持者擔任官職!”

民联在霹雳执政时,有把人民的钱当成自己的钱吗?有这么大声地说“这些钱,是民联的钱”吗?诺奥马最后驳斥冯宝君的一句“所謂國陣的錢,就是政府的錢!”,重申了他的立场。却也把问题,越描越黑。把话,说的越听越觉得刺耳。如果一个部长可以糊涂到把政府的钱,说成政党的钱; 那么会不会有可能糊涂到把国家的钱,当作自己的钱?

尊贵的农长,您老人家的意思,我们明白。我们真的,真的,明白得不得了。。。

50多年的一党独大,我们究竟什么时候才能够用有成熟的人民代议士?

拥有脑袋不装草的政客?拥有没有政党偏见的部长?

这个政府,究竟是为了人民服务?还是为了某政党服务?

既然他们好搞不清楚状况,那么来届大选,就只好让这些钱,换个政党来执政掌管吧!

HIMPUNAN MANSUH ISA AKAN DIADAKAN PADA 1 OGOS 2009

Posted in 内安法令 (ISA), 活动 (Activity) with tags , , on June 22, 2009 by sanjiun

GERAKAN MANSUHKAN ISA
KENYATAAN AKHBAR
HIMPUNAN MANSUH ISA AKAN DIADAKAN PADA 1 OGOS 2009
Isnin, 22 Jun 2009

1. Sekretariat Himpunan MANSUH sebagai penganjur Himpunan MANSUH ditubuhkan khas bagi menggerakkan rakyat menyatakan sikap terhadap akta zalim, Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri (ISA) melalui perhimpunan secara aman.

2. Sekretariat diwakili oleh wakil-wakil daripada anggota Gabungan Gerakan Mansuhkan ISA (GMI) terdiri daripada badan bukan kerajaan (NGO), parti-parti politik dan mahasiswa. Jawatankuasa Pepandu Himpunan MANSUH diwakili oleh pimpinan parti-parti politik dan NGO.

3. Hari ini Sekretariat Himpunan MANSUH ingin memaklumkan secara rasminya tarikh Himpunan Besar-besaran Mansuhkan ISA iaitu pada hari Sabtu, 1 Ogos 2009.

4. Tarikh 1 Ogos 2009 dipilih sempena 49 tahun ISA yang digubal pada 1 Ogos 1960. Selama 49 tahun negara dinaungi kezaliman ISA. Masa yang terlalu lama untuk negara dibiarkan diselubungi dengan akta yang empunya kuasa amat luas menahan tanpa bicara, menghukum tanpa bukti dan memenjarakan tanpa tempoh menentu. Sudah tiba masanya akta usang itu bukan sahaja dikajisemula tetapi dimansuhkan sama sekali.

5. Himpunan MANSUH dianjurkan dengan hasrat untuk rakyat menzahirkan sikapnya secara jelas dan lantang dengan membuat tiga tuntutan:

a. Bebaskan semua tahanan ISA
b. Mansuhkan ISA
c. Tutup Kem Kamunting – Kem ’Guantanamo’ Malaysia

6. Pada 3 April 2009, sebaik menjadi Perdana Menteri ke-6, Dato’ Seri Najib telah membebaskan 13 orang tahanan ISA (termasuk dua orang tahanan Hindraf) dan mengumumkan untuk mengkajisemula ISA. Satu tindakan yang dikatakan bukan populis. Empat hari kemudian pada 7 April, Pilihanraya Kecil 2 Bukit 1 Batang berlangsung.

7. Pada 8 Mei 2009, 13 orang lagi tahanan dibebaskan termasuk tiga orang lagi tahanan Hindraf. Sekali lagi ini dikatakan bukan tindakan populis sedangkan sehari sebelumnya berlaku titik hitam di Perak.

8. Dalam pada pembebasan diumumkan, secara senyap-senyap empat orang tahanan baru ditahan sekitar bulan April termasuk Mas Selamat Kastari yang dilaporkan lari daripada ISA Singapura. Bahkan sebenarnya di Kem Kamunting masih terdapat seramai 14 orang tahanan ISA seperti yang dilaporkan GMI. Tiga orang daripadanya telah ditahan lebih daripada 7 tahun.

9. Cadangan untuk kajisemula ISA pula dibuat sejak 3 April 2009, lebih dari 2 bulan yang lalu. Tetapi sehingga kini, tiada sesiapa tahu bila sebenarnya kajian tersebut akan siap. Suhakam sudah mengesyorkan ISA dimansuhkan sejak 2003 lagi. Pada masa yang sama, sudah ada peruntukan undang-undang sediada yang mencukupi untuk menangani keganasan.

10. ISA memusnahkan konsep asas undang-undang berperlembagaan. Ia mencemar asas pengasingan kuasa. Ia membenarkan kuasa eksekutif melangkaui kehakiman dengan menahan seseorang tanpa waran, tanpa bicara dan tanpa hak peguam. ISA telah menghapuskan apa juga semakan undang-undang yang disyorkan perlembagaan. ISA juga membenarkan kuasa yang luas, arbitrari dan tidak boleh dicabar mahkamah yang menyebabkan berlakunya penyeksaan fizikal dan mental.

11. Kemuncak asas-asas ISA ialah elemen mengancam, mengugut dan mewujudkan rasa takut dan gerun…”climate of fear”…”under siege mentality”… sehingga merencatkan daya fikir dan teguran berani serta fitrah manusia yang bebas.

12. Atas sebab keadaan ini, atas sebab kezaliman berterusan dengan penahanan tanpa bicara, arbitrari, tanpa pembelaan dan tanpa diketahui bilakah dibebaskan, penganiayaan ke atas isteri, anak dan keluarga dan atas tuntut keadilan, maka rakyat perlu zahirkan kebenciannya terhadap ISA dan mendesak Kerajaan bertindak segera mansuhkan ISA. Tindakan populis dan berlengah-lengah oleh Kerajaan mesti dihentikan. Rakyat tidak harus terpedaya dan membenarkan amalan begini berterusan.

13. Himpunan MANSUH dianjurkan sebagai kesinambungan pelbagai usaha Gerakan Mansuhkan ISA (GMI) selama ini dalam membawa kesedaran tentang kezaliman ISA, membela nasib tahanan dan keluarga, membongkar kezaliman ISA dan mendesak Kerajaan untuk membebaskan tahanan, memansuhkan ISA dan menutup Kem Kamunting sehinggalah membawa kepada pembebasan ramai tahanan ISA dan janji kerajaan untuk mengkajisemula ISA.

14. Beberapa program akan dianjurkan menjelang Himpunan tersebut. Antaranya jelajah ceramah seluruh negara, pengedaran risalah, pertunjukan seni, forum, pengumpulan tandatangan, petisyen on-line dan sebagainya.

15. Himpunan MANSUH menganjurkan Himpunan besar-besaran bagi menyeru dan menggembleng seluruh warganegara Malaysia daripada pelbagai lapisan masyarakat, budaya, bangsa dan agama yang cintakan keadilan, kebenaran dan keamanan rakyat untuk turut serta berhimpun pada 1 Ogos 2009 bagi menyatakan sikap tegas kita terhadap ISA. Bersama memansuhkan ISA dan membebaskan bumi Malaysia daripada kezaliman!

Mansuhkan ISA!
Bebaskan Tahanan!
Tutup Kemta – Kem Guantanamo Malaysia!

Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh
Pengerusi Sekretariat Himpunan MANSUH
Pengerusi Gerakan Mansuhkan ISA (GMI)

“Gold vs Life: Save Our Bukit Koman” seminar

Posted in 生活 (Life), 社会 (Society), 活动 (Activity) with tags , on June 21, 2009 by sanjiun

“Gold vs Life: Save Our Bukit Koman” seminar

Date: 23-06-2009 (Tuesday)

Time: 8.00pm

Venue: Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall

For more info, please contact 谢先生 03-22746645

Or e-mail to info@scah.org.my

Please show your support and be there in BLACK.

“黄金vs人命:抢救武吉公满”讲座会

日期: 2009-06-23 (星期二)
时间: 8:00 pm
地点: 隆雪华堂讲堂
负责人: 谢先生 03-2274 6645
E-mail: info@scah.org.my
主办:隆雪华堂民权委员会
主持:凌国文(时事评论人)
主讲:

黄金雄(武吉公满反山埃委员会主席)
钟绍安(劳勿都赖区州议员)
陈慧君(环境与工业安全顾问)
陈亚才(隆雪华堂执行长)
穿着:黑衣为主

Cyanide toxicology: facts and nonsense

Posted in 环境 (Environment), 生活 (Life), 废话连篇 (Nonsense) with tags , , on June 18, 2009 by sanjiun

Somebody (Kit Lee) wrote this to MalaysiaKini on 4th of June: Nonsense to claim someone can get sick from cyanide.

He has been involved in exploration and mining for 40 years. And he claimed that using cyanide is perfectly safe. Well, what can you expect from a miner? Of course he would tell you that mining using cyanide is safe.

He started the article by introducing how to process gold using cyanide, and how SAFE it should be. He also mentioned how to denature cyanide after it is used. He also listed out 6 steps to limit the dangers of contamination. That’s is the ideal process according to ICMC (International Cyanide Management Code). Gold mining in Raub SHOULD BE SAFE IF THEY FOLLOW ICMC guidelines.

But the problem is: DO THEY FOLLOW THE CODE?

Kit Lee said, cyanide can be disintegrated under UV light exposure, therefore it is not toxic. However, the problem is, how long it takes to 100% disintegrate? What if the amount of cyanide being released is too much for the UV to disintegrate it? What if cyanide leaks to underground water and out of the reach of UV?

According to a review on 1997 approved EIA by Dr Glenn Miller from Nevada, US, he said the company did not follow the ICMC guidelines properly. They proposed a smaller scale of processing plant to apply for permit, but the exact facilities and the tailing processed per year is actually larger then what they proposed. Dr Miller called it “bait and switch”. If, there is a possibility the company being ‘dishonest’ in this way, how can we be so sure they follow the safety measurements according to ICMC guidelines?

Kit Lee also mentioned that cyanide can be denatured using chlorine, iodine and common hydrogen peroxide before discharge. But what about the big tanks of sodium cyanide before used? What if there is leakage from these big tanks? The cyanide that stored in their facility, haven’t being denatured? Also, what will happen if there is failure of tailing ponds and release the cyanide into local ponds or river?

facility1

Also, we must remember that, the facility located TOO CLOSE to residential area. Only a road away from residential area. No buffering zone between facility and houses, shop lots and even school. Is there the ideal place to store such a big tank of sodium cyanide? If there is any spills, the residents will not have enough time to evacuate. Besides that, according to Dr Miller’s report, the company proposed a smaller scale when they apply for permits. Is their risk assessment and management designed according to the smaller scale they proposed or exact scale they have now?

In the last paragraph of Dr Miller’s review, he said:

Thus, the 1996 EIA, in addition to being inadequate even at the time it was written, does not now even consider some of the major impacts of waste rock dumps, major milling and metallurgical processes that would be required to process the new ore being mined. The human and environmental risks of the tailings and contaminated water that will drain from the tailings are of such magnitude that it is my opinion that the entire EIA process should be started over, using current international standards for an environmental analysis.

If ICMC is the “golden rules” in setting up a gold mine, then Dr Miller’s advice is what we should follow, as he was one of the expert who involved in drafting the ICMC.

Indeed, just like what mentioned by Kit Lee, cyanide occurs naturally in many roots especially unripe tapioca and the indigenous people have been using these to ‘poison’ fish and yet the fish is edible.

I couldn’t agree with Kit Lee that cyanide is SAFE TO EAT. If cyanide is SAFE, why the fish are dead? Small dosage of cyanide, is enough to kill fish, but not enough to kill a healthy adult (yet). It is due to our body’s mechanism to get rid of mild cyanide ingested (from fish, tapioca or some other plant). It will be converted into thiocyanate, which is 7X less toxic and discarded from our body via urine. However, high level of thiocyanate  will still be able to cause damage to our body. And with ENOUGH dosage of cyanide, it can kills a normal, healthy, young adult. In some cases, people died of eating too much cassava/tapioca (cyanide overdose).

Indigenous people has been using cyanide to poison fish. But it seems like Kit Lee doesn’t know what devastating effect it causes. In many places (countries) where indigenous people using cyanide to poison fish, coral reefs and marine life were threatened. We lost many valuable species of corals and marine life due to cyanide poisoning. Colouful corals died and whole marine ecosystem disturbed. Do we want the same thing happen in Bukit Koman? Even a small dosage of cyanide can cause such a long term effect to marine ecosystem, just imagine what a big tanks of sodium cyanide can do.

Kit Lee said: “The current concerns by the Bkt Koman villages are due to misinformation, fear-mongering and emotion. It is nonsense to claim someone can get sick from cyanide. If you consume too much you just ‘suffocate’ and die, you do not get sick”.

How true is the statement? How many scientific publications he read? How many medical references he refers to? I wonder who is MISLEADING the readers here.

Read this – a report published by U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services:

Memory impairment has been reported as a delayed effect in individuals who survived a cyanide poisoning incident with antidotal treatment. A female developed difficulties with short-term memory 5 months after ingesting an unknown amount of an unspecified cyanide compound (Chin and Calderon 2000).

Well, I hope he won’t suffer memory impairment when he grows old one day and forget what he wrote to MalaysiaKini. Cyanide can bind to an important enzyme that carries oxygen in our body. Once cyanide binds to the enzyme, the enzyme can no longer carries oxygen into cells. Cells do not get enough oxygen. In a healthy normal adult, mild cyanide can be detoxed from body. But what about small children, babies or senior citizens? They do not have a terrific detox system to get rid of toxic in their body. And how can our children grow up healthily in such a oxygen deprived environment?

Is Kit Lee a doctor? NO. He is a mine operator. He has insufficient knowledge to tell us how safe cyanide is to our body. He claimed he operated a small ‘Heap Leach’ operation in Kelantan in the 1990s with no cyanide hazards. I do not know how SMALL his operation is, but Bukit Koman is definitely BIG.

We need answers from experts – a real expert; a doctor; a reseracher; an environmentalist… But definitely not a mine operator.

This is just like listen to Raub Australian Gold Mining company telling you that their mine in Bukit Koman is SAFE and environmental friendly; or a politician telling you that politic is CLEAN.

Bukit Koman residents welcome developement and wealth brought by gold mining activity. But with such an amout of cyanide storing just one road away from their residential area is just like living with a time bomb.

Kit Lee, if that is your own village where your family and kids live in, I wonder if you would say the same thing?

三王子,请保重!

Posted in 视频分享 (Videos) with tags on June 11, 2009 by sanjiun

你们不觉得奇怪吗?

5月31日,丹州三王妃,马诺哈拉从新加坡逃脱,回到印尼。一下飞机,就笑脸迎人(好吧,脱离魔掌是值得开心的)。然后就马不停蹄的接受印尼电台访问。上电视细述自己所遭受的不人道对待。新婚不到一年的王子变成了魔鬼。禁锢,性虐待;更被打针,让她从苗条美少女,变成胖大婶。让外界误以为,王子与公主幸福快乐。

在电视上,她洋洋洒洒的说了一大堆,包括自己身旁的警卫有多森严,对着镜头丝毫没有一点胆怯。说到被虐待,她没有那种说到伤心处,情不自禁流眼泪的情节。看起来,这十来岁的女子,经过了一场梦魇后,她倒是很镇定。

按照常理,一个的被虐者,这个时候,应该忙着去验伤,去报警。甚至不愿意在公众场合提起自己最黑暗的过去。就算上了电视,也应该会让观众看看自己的伤口,以验正身。马诺哈拉说,伤口在胸部。不能让大家看,那么情有可原。可是据她说,王子经常使人替她打针,那么针孔应该不会也在胸部吧。。。总有些什么可以让大家看看的吧!

仔细看看影片,却发现她皮白细肉。。。不知道是王子真的那么厉害,挣扎中还可以选择虐待在人家看不到的地方? 还是摄影棚的化妆师的化妆技巧高超?

6月7日,传出他的代表律师发飚说不干了。理由是马诺哈拉没有诚意。该律师原本出于同情,提供免费的法律援助。结果马诺哈拉一而再,再而三不肯去验身,把律师气疯了。就连一开始要帮忙的妇女组织,都因此放弃了。

指当事人拒验身报警  丹三王妃律师不干了 – 《中国报》,June 7, 2009

律师卡里基斯说,他的前当事人和母亲,忙着召开记者会而不愿前往验身和报警。

“她(三王妃)告诉我,说曾在大马被打、熏伤、注射药物和虐待,但却还未去验身和报警。”

他说,本身是专业律师,当初是免费为马诺哈拉的母亲提供咨询服务,但现在,因觉得她的态度不认真,所以不会再参与此案了。

另外,当地某妇女组织也因为马诺哈拉和其母亲,无法出示证据,而拒绝再协助她们。

一个受到如此虐待的人,按照正常逻辑,应该赶在伤口还没有消失前,第一时间去验伤,而不是忙着好像明星似地接受访问。哪里有道理等到一个星期后也还没有验伤报警的?一个星期,就算在她潜逃的那一天曾经被虐待,很有可能伤口也已经愈合了。隔了那么久才验伤,谁知道伤口是哪里来的?这一段期间内,不是王子,她还接触过谁呢?那么迟才还不验伤,对王子也不公平吧!

6月10日,媒体报道说验身报告出炉。意思就是,她在6月7日-9日去验伤。

身体伤痕累累,曾被针孔注射,法医检验证实马诺哈拉遭虐待 – 《当今大马》,6月10日

随后,她向印尼媒体指控在吉兰丹王宫过着非人生活,东姑法克立如同动物一般对待她,将她视为性奴,同时以残暴手段伤害她的身体,包括刀片割伤和打毒针。

根据法新社(AFP)报道,一名法医慕宁依德利斯(Mun’im Idries)说,“她身上多个部位拥有许多割伤的疤痕,尤其是她的胸部。其中一些是新的疤痕”。

“我们还在检验其血液和尿液样本,因为她声称自己曾被打毒针。”

他也表示,他在马诺哈拉背部发现一个针孔注射的痕迹。

法医说,马诺哈拉满身是伤,但是她一下飞机接受访问的时候,却一点也看不出。开了那么多记者招待会,一点也看不出是个刚刚逃出魔掌的女子。

法医还说,她的身上有很多伤口,有一些,还是新的伤口。新的?!?“新”的意思是有多新?几天?几个星期?不要忘了,她回到印尼整个礼拜后才去验伤的呢!还能找到“新”的伤口?

那么血液样本呢?究竟毒针是什么针?有多毒?

她昨日接受医药检验后向 TV One 电视台披露,其丈夫经常与她行房前,都会为她注射不明药物。

“我不知道我被注射什么,但是我却动弹不了。我看到、感觉到、听到与嗅到,我的感官还在,只是我无法动弹。”

之前访问时说被打荷尔蒙针,好让她变胖,看起来像个开心的胖大婶。现在又说被注射类似迷药的东西?究竟是哪一样呢?

两夫妻之间的问题,一个巴掌拍不响。或许也不能够完全怪女方。16岁“蒲”惯了的模特儿,也迫不及待娶过来,王子也太急了一点。结果搞成这样,也多少有一点责任。只能说,‘色字头上一把刀’了。而这刀砍下来,对两个国家所造成的伤害,也是没有人预料到的。

我真的很想同情她。照理来说,身为女人,我不可以不同情她。但是,直到今天,我还是嗅到了“鱼腥味”(smelling fishy)。这个年头,天使还是魔鬼,总是让人分不清楚。

马诺哈拉说的话,始终让我觉得:这个女的,很不简单。似乎她的问题也比较大一点。

三王子,保重了!

MCA Liow Tiong Lai’s reply on Bukit Koman Cyanide issue

Posted in 环境 (Environment), 视频分享 (Videos) with tags , on June 9, 2009 by sanjiun

This video was taken by an MCA blogger who is concered about Bukit Koman residents’ plight. He asked the question on a MCA 60th Anniversary function at Penang recently.

This is how MCA Liow Tiong Lai replied on Bukit Koman Cyanide issue. As a Health Minister, his focus wasn’t on the effect of cyanide to Rakyat’s Health or impact on environment. Instead, he blamed the whole thing on:

- Pakatan Rakyat magnifying the issue;

- Cyanide problem being politicize by Pakatan Rakyat;

- Pakatan Rakyat use cyanide problem to attack MCA in the last GE and caused the lost of few BN seats in Pahang and MCA will take necessary steps to solve this problem (regarding the attack of PR on this issue, not cyanide problem);

- MCA tightly monitor the gold mining activities in Pahang;

- Residents in Bukit Koman has no objection to cyanide-gold mining method….

Bukit Koman people has NO OBJECTION???

Is he living in the same dimension/world as we do?

From where he heard that Bukit Koman people were happy about it? Then why do Bukit Koman people cry upon hearing their request for judiciary review was dismissed by high court judge?

亲巫统回教党支持者的春秋大梦

Posted in 政经文教 (Politic) with tags , on June 9, 2009 by sanjiun

之前不知怎么的,在面子书里add 了一位亲巫统的回教党支持者(又或者是党员)。于是,大家就成了面子书上的朋友。刚开始我根本不知道他的背景。偶尔看见他在自己的面子书里写了一些有建设性的东西。有时候,我也参与了辩论和批评。

不知从什么时候开始,他的言论开始变得有点怪怪的。

有一次,他的家里进了贼,警方说可能是飚车一族干的。后来每一次有飚车族的案件时,他就激动地在面子书乱骂一轮。可是,有时候却连不该骂的,也骂上了。青年古甘和阿迪安华在警方的扣留下怀疑遭受不人道对待时,他不但没有同情受害者,还反骂民联议员们袒护飚车党/偷车贼。他们是不是真的贼,没有人知道,古甘被扣留后尸体满是伤痕(死无对证),阿迪肿得猪头似得的进医院,昏迷不醒。。。这丝毫也没有让他以同情的心态来看待。他看到的,只是公正党和行动党一群议员对匪徒的袒护。

不久前,他举家到欧洲旅行。一去就去了整个星期。哗,原来这位仁兄很有钱一下喔。。。旅行回来,正好是大马发现首两宗甲型流感病例的时候。几天后,他的女儿病了。当时大马卫生部因为没有其他病例而解除了流感警报。虽然如此,大家惊魂未定,老师们还处于防范未然的状态。因为他们一家之前刚刚出国度假,所以老师建议他的女儿在家养病,直到完全康复为止。学校里有其他的学生,老师当然也要顾及其他学生的健康。身为有责任感的家长,也应该在这个时候让孩子自我隔离才是。万一真的是甲型流感,学校内爆发集体感染怎么办?

可是他非但不体谅老师们的苦心,还在面子书里抨击学校老师。说老师没有看新闻吗?不知道流感警报解除了吗?我尝试告诉他,这不能怪老师。虽然警报解除,可是不代表不会再有新的病例出现。老师们也是为了以防万一。他较后在面子书里回复,说老师不应该这样。因为还有两个星期,就是女儿的年中考试了。唉。。。都知道考试要到了,你也不是一样举家出国旅行吗?那个时候怎么不紧张?

这几天他因为回教党改选,亲巫统派胜出,哈迪阿旺的‘与巫统合作’的概念而觉得十分期待。面子书里的留言,提了又提。仿佛这是个梦幻组合,仿佛这次的合作是势在必行了。这时候,我才从怀疑(亲巫统派回教党),变成肯定。原本我假装没有看见他写的留言。昨晚手痒忍不住,也给他留言了。

我问:您是否认为,回教党‘加入’一个充斥着金钱政治和贪腐的政党是一件好事来的?

没想到,他很快就回复我的留言:哦,不是‘加入’,是‘合作’。。。其实什么政党都是其次,最重要的是以人民为优先。。。(还有一大堆有的没的的逻辑)

我再问:对。比较像是‘合作’。那么回教党是以回教教义为基础的,和一个被人民唾弃的贪腐政党合作,岂不是违背了回教教义?那么回教党,怎么还能算是回教党了呢?

他又回复了一些有的没的的道理。来来去去都只是在说什么“以人民为本啦”,“党派之间的议程只是其次啦”。始终没有回答到问题的中心。最后又说,能够组成‘梦幻组合’,当然开心。没有的话,想想也不错。(难道巫统的金钱政治真的有那么大的魅力?)

原本还想再回复:“308大选后,选已经开始厌恶国阵了。就连补选,国阵也是连连败阵。如果回教党和国阵和作,不怕让选民讨厌吗?”

原本理念根本不同的政党,硬要这样拉起来搞‘合作’。违反民主精神,值得吗?说是为了造福人民,如果国阵懂得这个道理,也不会搞到308大选时候那么狼狈了。‘造福人民’?我看也只是亲巫统派回教党一厢情愿的想法。50多年的金钱政治,巫统里的人会肯放下利益,把蛋糕慷慨的分你一半吗?或者突然变成圣人,不玩金钱政治,专心为人民服务吗?到最后,回教党的分裂问题,还是会延烧到巫统内部去。人民?最终还是你们异想天开的牺牲品。

后来想想,算了吧!回教教义博大精深,他都领略不到个中奥妙。。。一心寻死,我在面子书的三言两语也只怕没什么功效。再说,我也没有这个义务要教‘精’他吧!名不正,则言不顺。连自己追求的是什么也不清楚,怎么成得了气候?我想,我会比较欣赏那个总是喊着成立回教国,但选择远离贪腐滥权,以身体力行来贯彻宗旨的回教党。

所以我说:“好吧!那就希望和回教党的合作,可以把好的‘磁场’带给国阵吧!”

亲巫统派的人,因该都是有这样的想法。如此根深蒂固的思考模式,还是继续让他做他的春秋大梦好了!

pas-umno

于是接下来,就看到他一班‘志同道合’的朋友,一直谈论着,鼓舞着,开心着,幻想着,做梦着。。。我退出面子书,熄灯睡觉去。梦里分不清,是我梦见了他们,还是他们在梦里梦见了我。。。

不要塑料袋,真的达到环保效果吗?

Posted in 环境 (Environment), 生活 (Life) with tags , , on June 8, 2009 by sanjiun

槟城7月开始每周一,实行“无塑料袋日”。这真的是一个很好的消息。使用塑料袋,消费者必须多付20仙,并将多付的钱,捐给慈善机构。这样的方法,消费者肯定会慢慢改变态度,记得携带环保带出门购物。根据槟城州政府的估计,如果檳州人一天不使用塑膠袋,垃圾堆就会少了不下於10萬個塑膠袋!

no plastic

不过,商家不派塑胶袋,消费者自己携带环保袋就真的可以减少塑料袋的使用量,达到环保的效果吗?

大家先来回想一下,自己回怎么处理每次购物时收到的塑料袋。

我喜欢Jusco的塑料袋,因为可以分解(虽然他们仍然适用以石油为原料的分解塑料袋)。我经常会把塑料袋拿来装垃圾。如此一来,垃圾到了垃圾处理场后,打包垃圾的塑料袋也会一起分解。这也是为什么,我仍然不太积极的自备环保袋到Jusco买东西。我要用他们的分解袋装家里的垃圾。反而是偶尔到楼下杂货商店买东西时,我不会要老板们的给我无法分解的塑料袋。

我相信 很多人都和我一样(尤其是精打细算的消费者),都会利用百货公司的塑料袋来打包家里的垃圾。试想想:如果商家(百货公司)不在派发塑料袋,消费者们家里的垃圾,要用什么来打包呢?再说,当消费者需要买一些湿淋淋的东西(例如:鱼,虾,肉等等)。。。肯定希望使用塑料袋,而不是环保购物袋。

没有免费塑料袋,唯一的方法,就是另外购买垃圾袋。可分解的垃圾袋比较昂贵,或许很多人选择价格便宜的非分解塑料袋。也可能有些人根本不知道垃圾袋有分“能分解”和“不能分解”的垃圾袋。又有可能,一些地方的商店,没有售卖“可分解”的垃圾袋。

结果,塑料袋的使用量,一样不会少到哪里去。人们只是用另外购买的“垃圾袋”,取代了买东西时从商家那里拿的“塑料袋”。而且,消费者还必须自掏腰包另外花费一笔钱来买“垃圾袋”。

当然,槟城州政府这项举措,虽然不是最完美的解决方法,但却是一个好的开始。不管怎么样,我始终认为,与其限制商家不派塑料袋给顾客,倒不如立法规定商家一定要使用“可分解”塑料袋。 “可分解”塑料袋,除了有以石油为原料的以外,近年来,也有一些以植物为原料的”可生物分解”塑料袋(注)。这些塑料袋,除了可以被微生物,阳光,空气和水分解以外,当然也更加安全(植物为原料嘛!)。用来装食物也不会担心会产生什么致癌物质。

PLA是一種丙交酯聚酯,俗稱聚乳酸,它的原料主要是來自植物(例如:玉米),而非倚賴有限的石油資源,因此具有永續發展的特點。

更值得指出的是,PLA可以在土壤中被微生物分解成二氧化碳和水,沒有環境污染。在未來10十 年內,PLA將逐漸取代性質相近之塑膠如PET、PS成為最有前途的聚合物。而PLA可以在短期之內重新變成CO2和H2O進入自然界,再通過太陽光合作 用,變成澱粉,是真正無公害可再生的綠色環保塑膠產品。 – < 星洲日报> 2009-06-07

大马是个农业国,种植业一向是大马引以为傲的。政府和各研究机构应该更加积极的寻找其他(除了玉米和油棕)更加便宜的替代品来生产“可分解”塑料。

推广及立法规定使用“可分解”塑料袋,岂不是一个更好的方法?

bio_bag_500

biodegradable-plastic-bags-photo

注:  “可分解”(degradable)和“可生物分解”(biodegradable)有所不同。一些以石油为原料的塑料可以被分解,但不是被微生物彻底分解/腐烂。而“可生物分解”的塑料袋则是由植物为原料,可以被微生物分解,“吃掉”,进入微生物的食物链。所以更加环保。

First, cyanide in Bukit Koman; now, radioactive waste in Kuantan!!!

Posted in 环境 (Environment), 社会 (Society), 视频分享 (Videos) with tags , , on June 5, 2009 by sanjiun

An Australian company, Lynas Corporation Ltd. is now setting up a RARE EARTH processing plant in Gebeng, Kuantan, Pahang. It was reported that Lynas Corporation Ltd would invest RM1bil to produce lathanides – chemical products from rare earth minerals, which are a group of metal elements and RADIOACTIVE substances will be involved in this process.

Lets take a look at this study published in 1973 – Effect of dust of rare earth metals containing a radioactive component on incidence of reticulosarcoma of the lung:

The presence of the long-life radioactive elements uranium and thorium in mineral dust, occurring as isomorphic inclusions in the crystal lattice of natural minerals, may promote the onset of carcinogenesis in the lungs, for which the minimal carcinogenic dose is close to 1000 rad. Spontaneous lung tumors are rare in albino rats , and the term ‘lymphoma’ of the rodent lung which appears in the literature is simply the result of the absence of precise criteria of tumor growth in the peribronchial lymphoid tissue. This may account for the fairly higher percentage (6-7) of spontaneous reticuloblastomas of the lungs reported by a number of workers.

GREAT!!!

First, cyanide in Bukit Koman; now, radioactive waste in Kuantan pulak!!!

Both the Bukit Koman gold mining company and this rare earth processing plant was owned by AUSTRALIAN company and both were set up in PAHANG – one of the BN stronghold in Peninsular.

The company will harvest minerals from mines in Autralia, and send to Malaysia to PROCESS. Agian, they claim everything is under control and the radioactive substance has been take care of APPROPRIATELY. If it is so, why don’t they set up the processing plant in Australia? Lynas Corporation Ltd did apply permission from Autralia and China govt to set up processing plant in both country but was rejected by the govt. The question is, why Lynas was rejected by both Australia and China govt but get permission from Pahang state govt to set up their plant in Kuantan, and get their tax waived for 12 years?

The people near Gebeng only came to know about this plant about 6 months ago. They tried to have a dialog with the company. But the company fail to give a satisfactory explanation on how they get rid of the radioactive waste. The water released from the plant will be channeled into Sg. Balok. If there is any leakage, the water will be contaminated. Do they want to see tragedy in Kg Tanah Merah,Perak to repeat itself?

Rare Earth

Tragedi yang menimpa penduduk-penduduk di Bukit Merah, Perak sekitar tahun 1982-87 eloklah dijadikan teladan. Ramai yang telah meninggal dunia akibat pendedahan kepada sisa-sisa radioaktif – leukemia, kanser, kelahiran bayi cacat dan sebagainya. Menentang Sisa Radioaktif, 13 Jan 2009

Upon receiving complaints from the residents, Sahabat Alam Malaysia try to get EIA report from Jabatan Alam Sekitar Pahang. However, Jabatan Alam Sekitar Pahang refuse to reveal the report and later told them that the EIA was already approved by the Jabatan Alam Sekitar Pahang. So, what is so secretive about the report that JASP refuse to reveal?

Is Malaysia some kind of 3rd world country that other country can dump their toxic waste? Or carry out dangerous processes cause if any leakage happens, only Malaysians will be poisoned and not their country’s people?

What kind of role our govt plays to ensure our people’s safety besides keep telling us:

“Gold-mining using cyanide is safe IF HANDLE PROPERLY… blah blah blah…”

“Radioactive waste is safe IF HANDLE PROPERLY… blah blah blah…”

Things screwed up, even in an advance country like US.

How can we be so sure that in this Bolehland (with stadium collapse, parliament building leaking…), we can do a better job then those people?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.